Smart Heat

In 2018 - 2019, BOOST acquired 100% voting rights to Smart Heat. The most significant claims shall be addressed to RMC, Multiclet, Radius Group, Qiwi, Sergey Bobylev, Oxana Bobyleva, AFK Sistema, Tinkoff Bank, Dynasty Fund, and the Institute Shang Shun. Further investigation of the case collected evidence of its connection with the Russian Capital Bank, Bananamama, Bank of Moscow, Sunrise illegal captures, Hermitage Capital, fire in Winter Cherry, and the Yukos cases. If you have any further queries regarding the information in this section, contact our PR department.

Substance of the case

In December 2018, BOOST acquired from Martynov O.S. and Martynov K.M. rights to claim 100% of the Smart Heat business. Martynov created this business by the invitation of Sergey Bobylev, former Sunrise CEO, co-owner, and co-founder. In the beginning, Smart Heat was intended to be a network of crypto farms with its production of crypto mining equipment. Martynov financed the business. Bobylev had to manage it. These agreements concluded between Martynov and Bobylev were not formalized in written form. Martynov appointed Bobylev informally as a general director in the relevant business entities. For several reasons, Martynov named him as a genuine beneficiary of the company and bundled the legal entities to the nominal shareholders - his son and the married daughter of Bobylev, Alina. They did not pay even a penny for the equity in the company. Martynov gave them money, and both the daughter of Bobylev and the son of Martynov were nominal shareholders.

Following the Sunrise case, the request addressed by BOOST to Bobyleva to eliminate her daughter Alina from the nominal shareholders of the Smart Heat was one of the reasons why Bobyleva participated in the illegal seizure of the BOOST and murder attempts of Raevskaya-Repnina. Bobyleva was seeking a way to move her former husband Bobylev behind the bar and stay free with all property. As long as the daughter of Bobylev did not pay for the charter capital, her equity stake ownership was invalid, and she was not a legitimate shareholder. Her exit from equity did not imply the obligation to pay her something. As soon as BOOST started to move out Alina from the Smart Heat equity, Bobyleva organized the scheme to frame Raevskaya-Repnina - to save the share in Smart Heat.

Martynov gave Bobylev cash for the maintenance of farms and to purchase the equipment. Bobylev purchased chips, spare parts, and assembled equipment for farms. He did that mainly for cash, explaining that by the high price of cashless payments or the inability to buy the chips officially. Electronic chips were smuggled into Russia with the stewards on the airplanes. This scheme was organized by Bobylev. The purchases were not properly documented. Electronic chips and spare parts, as well as assembled miners, and earned cryptocurrency was unaccounted for on the balance sheet.

Thus Bobylev replicated the Smart Heat based on Sunrise's business model. Considering the history of Sunrise, and its connection with Vyacheslav Ivankov and Solntsevskaya OCG, probably this money was generated in their name, and they were the real beneficiaries of this business. This explains why the financials of the business were not officially accounted for and it was black. Thus - the use of proceeds of this business was to finance criminal activity.

The precise amount of how many spare parts and chips that were bought still be unknown. Based on estimates, Bobylev purchased at least 10,000 chips for miners. The miners were assembled, switched on, and generated cryptocurrencies. The precise location where they mined the cryptocurrency and who the beneficiary received the currency - was unknown. A large part of miners was disposed to Abkhazia where the government announced the "crypto heaven". In this "heaven" the Abkhazian angels stole the whole Smart-Heat farm together with miners. Presumably, this "crypto heaven" in Abkhazia initially was created to finance the non-heaven business - terroristic actions and war in the close territories - Georgia, Armenia, Nagorny Karabakh, Chechnya, Karachaevo-Cherkessia, North Ossetia, South Ossetia. According to the witness statements of Bobyleva, later the farm was disposed of by its employees, and the exact place of the equipment location was unknown. The BOOST requested many times the personnel of the farm and Bobyleva to disclose the location of the farm and the equipment and return that back to Martynov's business, however, they did not do that. To the public, this farm's closure was explained by Abkhazian angels together with Bobylev as, after the changes in regulations, the energy prices increased, and the farm "became unprofitable." Again - no data were properly accounted for. Bobyleva tried to interrupt our activity to collect miners and bring them back to Moscow as a part of the Smart Heat property.

The exact calculations of income from crypto mining were not performed. Presumably, the miners and the farm equipment were moved out and stolen. BOOST also found several shadowed legal entities, their beneficiary was Sergey Bobylev. Martynov did not know the financial performance of the farms - how much money the miners generated, the funds he had to receive as an income from the farm, the structure of expenses, profit, dividends, etc. - these figures were unaccounted.

Thus, Martynov invested the money without the verified origin in the creation of a black crypto mining business which presumably generated cryptocurrency to finance illegal activity and was seized by Bobylev S., Bobyleva O., Radius Group, Multiklet, The Dzogchen Community Rinchenling, and The Institute Shang Shung together acting on behalf of Qiwi's beneficiary Sergey Salonin, the Ukrainian tycoon Nikolaev, and the personnel of the farms. That is the first batch of claims that arose from the acquisition of the Smart Heat rights representing the sum of the present value of the created and later destroyed Smart Heat business and the indemnification of the incurred damage and losses for the whole period of Smart Heat functioned as expected.

The second batch of the claims related to the performance of offenders in the Smart Heat case: Dmitry Marinichev, Sergey Bobylev, Oxana Bobyleva, Radius Group, Multiklet, Qiwi, The Dzogchen Community Rinchenling, and The Institute Shang Shung, Boris Titov, Partiya Rosta, and other minor defendants.

After the Smart Heat's farms were created and miners assembled, Bobylevs in parallel started to cooperate with the Radius Group to raise money for the ICO project to develop crypto farms. The project was led by the Radius Group company under the leadership of D. Marinichev, together with Yekaterinburg's IT company Multiklet, together with S.A. Bobylev. and Bobyleva O.G., Sergey Salonin, and Alexey Nikolaev started the RMC project under the patronage of Boris Titov.

For the development of the project, it was planned to make an ICO and issue digital tokens. The project was conceived as a crypto business accessible to everyone, and widely advertised as the largest digital farm in the Russian Federation. Marinichev (Radius Group), Multiclet, Sergey Salonin (Qiwi), Bobylev, and a Ukrainian tycoon Nikolaev had stakes in the project, however, the relationships were not formalized. The shareholder agreement was not developed and signed.

After the start of the project RMC in 2017, Bobylevs together with the RMC took the equipment from the Smart Heat business and handed it over to the RMC farm. Money for the equipment was not paid to Smart Heat. The Martynov did not get money for this, and the volume of equipment collected with the money of Martynovi and exported to the RMC is not known for sure.

Salonin was supposed to contribute 10% with equipment, but at the last moment he left the project, and instead of him, his acquaintance from The Dzogchen Community Rinchenling and The Institute Shang Shung Tatiana Kashirina and a friend Kshtuni got into the project. These two processed Bobylev, and he left Bobyleva, started to live with Kashirina, and this trinity began to control the RMC farm, presumably to the benefit of Salonin previously expressed a huge business interest in the crypto tech. Nobody knows the exact amount of cryptocurrency which was generated. We can identify that by the calculation only.

Radius Group, being an initiator of the project, unaccounted for either the miners or cryptocurrency, the company did not have a budget or precise investment plan. The RMC itself was not formed as a stand-alone company with a separate balance and did not account for either miners or mined currency. It is an unusual, nonstandard business practice that we observed never in white transparent business. If that was a real business project. With honest external investors, of course, that would not work. However, that worked, and RMC raised $6 mln in cash, as Marinichev said Nikolaev financed $20 mln, and thousands of miners were stolen from the Smart Heat which generated cryptocurrency without any accounting data.

It seems impossible that there will be idiots who will buy out the tokens of a non-existent company that was not registered in any way and for which there is no documentary evidence of existence. These idiots were found and financed for $6 million. In addition to them, according to Marinichev's words, Ukrainian oligarch Кonstantin Nikolaev poured money into the project about $20 mln. Since the peak of the growth of the bitcoin rate matched with two events - the presidential elections in the Russian Federation in 2018, and the Ukrainian military operation - there is no doubt about the sources of funding for such projects, and who formed the main demand for bitcoins. According to the FATF-GAFI report, digital assets are the core source of ethnic and racial-based terrorism financing. In RMC, nobody could tell the correct sum of raised funds, the concrete names of "investors," the income from operations, any other financial indicators, or the names of sponsors. RMC, as the Smart Heat, also did not account for the financials of the business, and it was black as well. Thus - the use of proceeds of RMC business as well as was to finance the criminal activity.

This case is closely connected to Teploservice. Oleg Andreev, the beneficiary of Teploservice, wanted to introduce this generous oligarch Nikolaev to Raevskaya-Repnina to ask him for money for the RVC project (Scrap Dating TM). Read about it in the relevant sections of our site.

This invitation coincided with the unsuccessful attempts of this "trinity" of Yakovlev, Martynov, and Bobyleva to substitute Raevskaya-Repnina with falsified documents following the cancellation of the flight by Siberia Airlines (which Andreev insisted on) for a personal meeting with the head of the Samara Investigative Committee. The ticket issued in the name of Raevskaya-Repnina turned out to be invalid - the ticket was issued with numerous errors in her name and surname, however, Siberia refused to reissue the ticket to the right personal data of Raevskaya-Repnina. Taking into account the terrorist past of Siberia, oddities with the issuance of a ticket, a strange invitation to a meeting with the investigative committee sent from the mail.ru address, and Andreev's insistence to immediately fly out, Raevskaya-Repnina did not do that. Considering the history of the project, we supposed she was invited for a hard landing of the aircraft or illegal placement in a pre-trial detention center on trumped-up prosecution.

Issuing a ticket for a different name, as well as the various variations which we observed with the spelling of the name and surname of Raevskaya-Repnina in different ways, misprints and errors in her data, the replacement of her date of birth in the medical records could presumably be related to the impossibility of her search by relatives and friends in the event of her death or disappearance, or the organization of illegal criminal prosecution against her. She could be in a morgue, illegally captured in the mental hospital, or in a pre-trial detention center under the amended name while the criminals would inform her relatives that she was missing. Before this case, criminals widely used such tricks to evade criminal prosecution. They hid from justice by drawing up documents for similar names with misprints or homonyms of their name and surname (e.g., slater or slayter), changing dates of birth and place of birth, in particular, as was done with the documents of Oleg Yakovlev, Evgeny Chichvarkin, Sergey Bobylev, and Andrey Borodin. We suggest that the same criminal group was behind the random "mistakes" in Raevskaya-Repnina's documents and the falsification of her medical history. We encountered the largest number of errors and typos in the personal data of Raevskaya-Repnina in the Office for Migration and its subdivisions, Federal Bailiff Service, PJSC MTS, PJSC Megafon, PayPal, The University of Oxford, The University of the People, Russian Post, PJSC VTB, territorial divisions, GU PFR, Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation, FSS of the Russian Federation, the traffic police of the Russian Federation, GKU AMPP, Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, divisions of the judicial system of the Russian Federation (courts and judicial districts), territorial divisions of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the Prosecutor General's Office, as well as in the airlines Siberia (S7) and Aeroflot, and every medical hospital where Raevskaya-Repnina was delivered after every incident by the ambulance.

So considering the nuances of fundraising and the project organization, the RMC project with its black business was created at cost of money without a proven legal origin. The leader of the project was Dmitry Marinichev, Internet Ombudsman under the President of the Russian Federation. The project was promoted by Boris Titov, leader of the Partia Rosta, Ombudsman for Entrepreneurs' Rights under the President of the Russian Federation. The money came from Ukraine, AFK Sistema (Qiwi its affiliate), and the Russian former banker who ran the financially insolvent bank with almost eliminated equity due to the disposal of the assets.

Thus, the RMC was not documented at all - either by shareholders or operational agreement, not by appropriate accounting data. As a result, the equipment paid by Martynov was transferred to the RMC to generate cryptocurrency to the benefit of RMC, presumably to launder money and to finance criminal activity including aggressive war and terrorism, the overthrow of power in Russia, and a part of them - unaccounted miners - generated cryptocurrency only to the benefit of Bobylev and the "peaceful Buddhists". The Martynovs were not paid for this, and the volume of equipment extracted from the money of Martynov and exported to the RMC is not known for sure. Later, some of the RMC miners got as a result of the theft of the Smart Heat miners, transferred to Oxana Bobyleva's premises to generate cryptocurrency for herself for personal usage.

Bobylev, Kashirina, and Kshtuni started to control the RMC'S crypto farm operations keeping the generated cryptocurrency for themselves, installed their miners (presumably - stolen from Smart Heat, and unaccounted as RMC miners) on the farm beyond the RMC project, and did not pay for electricity. Further, on the eve of the shutdown threshold for non-payment of electricity, Bobylev and Kshtuni, together with Kashirina (again - peace, love, Buddhism, The Dzogchen Community Rinchenling, and The Institute Shang Shung - non-commercial organizations not pursuing "political objectives"), drove a truck to the farm for the moving out of miners, but that repeated theft of previously stolen equipment was stopped by Marinichev, who, together with the thieves, stole the equipment for the first time, after this unsuccessful moving escapade the farm was temporarily closed, allegedly due to the fall in the bitcoin exchange rate - this misleading information was brought to the attention of investors, apparently, those idiots who brought in $6 million in cash. For several months, Marinichev, Bobyleva, and Zyryanov hid the real situation in the project. After Bobylev left the RMC and started his relationship with Kashirina, Bobyleva appealed to BOOST in search of revenge and brought to the BOOST Oleg Martynov to buy the claim against Bobylev to organize his prosecution again and send him to the correctional center. It was her intention she articulated - to see Bobylev behind the bar. Whether Bobyleva acted independently or someone directed her is unknown to us. We assume that she was not independent in her actions. However, what is coming from the description of both projects, Martynov's claims had to be addressed to Bobyleva as well. Later, that become obvious to us and her, and probably to Martynov who did not expect that we will dive very deep into details.

Thus, Bobyleva, Martynov, together with Oleg Yakovlev, within 2.5 weeks period issued in the name of Raevskaya-Repnina several falsified documents to the Moscow Arbitrary Court, to the JSC RC Status, and asked her to represent their interests in these organizations. Martynov asked to save Priladozhie LLC from bankruptcy by providing the power of attorney with the falsified signature and representing its interests in the courts and several tax inspections (#18 of the City of Moscow, and the tax inspection for Karelia). Yakovlev announced that he presents Raevskaya-Repnina with his shares in the PJCS ARSP Frunzenskogo Rayona and send her a falsified power of attorney with a falsified apostille which Raevskaya-Repnina had to submit in the JSC RC Status to fill the transfer of the shares in her name. Undoubtedly, both cases intended to organize a criminal prosecution against Raevskaya-Repnina with an accusation of fraud.

All three "business partners" had only one use of proceeds to eliminate Raevskaya-Repnina - to hide their criminal activity discovered by the BOOST during the representation of their interests followed the legally binding agreements made with the BOOST. The trio was part of a criminal scheme, as we previously suspected, whose exploits are described in the relevant sections of the Toxic Assets pages on our site. Their actions confirm their involvement in many aggravated crimes, including massacres and terrorism. Another option - the offenders approached them and offered the offset deal to initiate the criminal prosecution of Raevskaya-Repnina to rake in the heat with the wrong hands.

Coming back to RMC, as a part of the RMC, the "team" expected to produce miners under the brand Sunrise. Before the introduction of multiklet, they announced that these miners were equipped with an integrated security chip. The miners were produced without a security chip, so the conditions declared to investors were not met. To hide this as well, the miners, so as not to be handed over physically to their buyers, and the fraud was not revealed, the miners were immediately moved to the farm in the so-called mining club. Thus, instead of transferring real hardware - the miners, the investors got the abstract space in the "mining club."

Nobody in the project RMC knew the honest amount of funds raised, even Oxana Bobyleva. However, the ICO prospect mentioned her as the person responsible for the ICO process. Instead of the declared US$43 million with the threshold of $100 mln, the project collected about US$6 million in cash, and Marinichev, in the personal discussion, said about $20 mln came from Alexey Nikolaev. However, in the press, Marinichev and RMC team disclosed other information misleading the investors. The collected $6 mln funds were insufficient to create a multiklet chip for multicurrency mining and produce miners. The RMC Team sold tokens to collect funds and spend them to make new mining equipment with the Multiclet chip as if it were ready. After investors bought the tokens, the truth was revealed. The chip was not ready and did not exist, and the RMC team was going to produce it no earlier than in a year. However, as long as the announcement was made, the RMC continued to support the legend. Later, instead of a miner with an embedded multiklet chip, Marinichev sold to investors the promise to ship to investors only one multiklet chip with a 1-year delay in production. The chip has been created as a part of the state defense military order, at cost of the Russian Federation. Money of investors the RMC presumably spent for the rapid deployment of the large-scale ready-to-use crypto farm on ZIL.

Thus, the RMC team, under the management of the Internet Ombudsmen of the President of Russia Marinichev, just decided to monetize, for the benefit of his own pocket, the intellectual property created at the expense and by order of the defense sector of the Russian Federation, by analogy with Vimpelcom. In the same way, the same criminal group "founded" VimpelCom (see the Nord-Ost case). It is one family. Like meerkats, they look around and see what else to steal that is not stuck to their paws yet. In the RMC scenario, the RMC meerkats became so insolent, that they began to sell the intellectual property RMC did not yet create. The advance payment for the creation of the chip made by the Russian Federation state budget was redirected not to finance the chip creation. First, this money made the first spin of movement via scrolling it on the crypto-farm to put the income into the pocket. In Russia, it is specific to state defense order financing. When the government pays the advance for the defense order, the directors of the organizations, which received this, spin money several times instead of paying vendors. To vendors, they announce the postponed payments - e.g., 180 days after the order completion (e.g., Sberbank, Gazprom, NPO Saturn under the management of Ilya Fyodorov, Rostech did that). Thus, any external companies do not participate in this tender procedure imitation. Even they did that - they died. To spin the state budget money wasn't enough for criminals either. They not only illegally misused public money, but also did not pay contractors. That is, they received both money and work (see the KNPZ episode in Teploservice case). And the contractors went bankrupt and went to jail. Next, the money makes many spins: they circulate in financial or currency speculations, credit landing, or directed to the affiliated consumer financing companies working in the subprime segment or cryptocurrencies. Only family companies can resist in this environment - Neo Center and so on. No entrepreneur who works honestly and on market terms can survive in an environment where all purchases are made with a mandatory 100% advance payment, and payment for work is made after a year. The 1-year deficite of working capital with at least 40% of money value kills any business model. Of course, this is impossible to compete for well-qualified competent people. Only family members spin and work in the system. Thus, the hereditary underqualified incompetence flourishes and drives Lamborginin acquired at the cost of the Russian state budget and insolvency of honest private business. They are so accustomed to their family's incompetence that they do not just spread it everywhere wherever they can. They consider it the best practice, rejecting and destroying any glimpses of reason and a healthy mindset in this collective schizophrenia. It is not surprising that in this environment of incompetent schizoids, any healthy, educated, intelligent person seemed crazy to them. 100% of all purchases (goods and services) acquired by the Russian public sector could be purchased at least several times cheaper and incomparably better quality. Moreover, most of these purchases were never required to be bought at all.

These are those, from Slater and Bananamama's cases, who came up with the "healthy idea" to build retail according to the bank model. Because their own, honestly earned money has not been spinning in this retail for a single day ever. In this retail (including X5), state money was laundered - the advances that were laundered came through Alfa-Bank, VTB, Sberbank, and Gazprombank. The speculative margin on these scrolled state money is of such a size that the directors of such enterprises buy Lombarghini to their mistresses without any problems, travel with them to the Kurchavel resorts of France, bought Chanel, and Hermes in industrial quantity, and have everything in life. Easy money burned their pockets. Therefore, they bought without looking back at exorbitant prices obsolete in Europe and discounted items in GUM and TSUM as a new collection, last year's cars, that is, they simply bought everything in a row, built houses on Rublevskoye highway with 10 bedrooms, like a hotel, bought wine collections, and order ready meals at the highest possible price - just to invest stolen money without confirmed origin. As a result, both themselves and their wives with their mistresses looked like a wild Christmas tree hung with brands, as if they were dressing in the dark in someone else's dressing room. They are these motherfuckers who went down forever in the history of Courchevel as the organizers of orgies who do not know how to ski at all but move out in the form of a worm, twisting all parts of the body at impossible angles. With daring drunkenness, they skied without helmets, and how real motherfuckers thought it was cool to bring suntan from a ski resort with a trace of sunglasses on the face. For these shows on the ski slopes, they bought expensive Bogner clothes with stolen money and put Chanel bags over their shoulders on the mountain. This caused irreparable damage to the Bogner brand, the official outfitter to the German national ski team, and the psyche of healthy sober skiers. And with this stolen money, they create businesses, squeeze out shares in companies from those to whom they illegally lent government money, hoping to extract their "percentage", and also register intellectual property, licenses for various assets, and other stolen property in the name of their mistresses and family members. at the state. There are hundreds of thousands of these examples. In this shop, of course, there are no fair tenders and competitions. No normal entrepreneur will go to work for three kopecks with deferred pay in a year. Since the state transfers money in advance, this money, instead of being paid to worthy people, is spinning somewhere for a year, and the work is done not by smart and worthy, but by family members of the director of the enterprise, who agree to work with deferred payment for a year and receive money from the speculative gain on scrolling public money. There is not a single state-owned company with which we have been able to work from 2014 to the present, and where there would be no such situation. This monstrous state of affairs deserves special coverage. Thus, the RMC is just one example of how this system of spinning public money works.

Anyway, there was not enough funding to meet the project plan of RMC. Instead of beauty, transparent value-adding story, the project transformed into the black crypto business financed at cost of money without confirmed origin and developed by two visible political persons who organisationally were named as subordinates of the President of Russia. No need to tell how that impaired the image of the public authorities and the President. However, that was not noted by such "respectful" calling them as "investigative" mass media - Meduza, Echo Moskvy, Dozhd, BBC, ICIJ, and others. So, if this elephant eluded their attention - such a precise, close, and "fair" when they target somebody they do not like - that means that they or were financed from these crypto sources, or the story seems like "normal" for them. That explains the substance of their activity in Russia better than any words.

Initially, RMC offered investors a miner equipped with a Multiklet chip. After a long silence (because nobody knew what to say to escape scandal and public litigation), they made a movie to send the message to the public community that crypto farms now cannot get profit due to the bitcoin exchange rate. Bobyleva was cast in the main role. Next, in December 2018, Marinichev said that instead of a miner, the investors will get only a chip. The development of the multiklet chip was paid for under the state defense order. This order is made for defense encryption purposes (cryptography and decryption - to generate and crack keys). Marinichev paid off the debt for the farm’s electricity with money got for the state defense order execution, which was partially covered by Megafon's payments. The initial multiklet chip for the state government was not produced on time, as a result of which Marinichev and Radius had problems with misappropriation of funds under the state defense order and a bunch of deceived investors. They tried to calm down investors at a press conference with dinner and a buffet.

In addition, on the miners assembled in RMC and Smart Heat, the "team" used the trademark Sunrise. That generates the third batch of claims with regards to the copyright violation by the RMC "team."

Finally, there is a portion of another kind of issue related mostly to the state security question.

The start of the RMC project matched the period of the highest bitcoin rates with the presidential election - end of 2017 - the start of 2018. As we know, Navalny, FBK, and other terroristic activities were financed through digital assets, by Dynasty fund, sponsored by the family of Zimin-Evtushenkov. RMC was financed by AFK Sistema affiliates as well (Qiwi, which has a JV with MTS). RMC was created by the same model as Vympelcom. And organized by the same family. And financed by the same family, that previously financed the Nord-Ost terrorist act. A large part of RMC's business consisted of assets of AFK Sistema, and its' Ural cluster (Silterra, Multiclet), in particular, located in protest cities - Ekaterinburg, Novosibirsk. As remarkable proof of evidence, the political protests across Russia took part at the same time in 2017-2018 and matched the fire in the Winter Cherry case period. Consequently, the terrorist act in Winter Cherry in memory of Neo-Nazis' parents was financed presumably through RMC, cynically at costs of money stolen from the Russian state budget, and by the company owned and managed by Internet Ombudsmen of the President of Russia Marinichev under the supervision of another ombudsman - dedicated to the entrepreneurs' rights, Boris Titov. It is difficult to imagine a more shameful and disgraceful story for the image of the President of the Russian Federation and the official authorities. The same money financed the election campaign of Titov, Sobchak, Navalny, and their parties. It is a little bit unclear where the hell the Central Election Commission and the Prosecutor General's Office were looking into.

As soon as the demand for bitcoin drove the supply, and from another angle FBK actively used cryptocurrency to gather for its activity financing, we suppose that the money to finance terroristic and extremist activity in Russia was sourced from the cryptocurrency mined on Smart Heat and RMC farms as they were the largest sources of cryptocurrency in Russia at that moment. The geography of cities where the outcries were organized, precisely matches the combined Hermitage Capital core episodes geography. That was focusing on the politically unstable cities where we note the core episodes of the criminal activity of the Hermitage Capital combined case and the toxic assets. For mass protests, the criminals used the cities with an unstable political situation that is easy to shake, preferring those with an unfavorable criminal status and the highest crime rate in terms of the number of murders. That is easy to kindle a bloody revolution by starting it in a criminal protest city where murders are considered a norm.

So, now we have a 100% overlapped map of episodes related to the Hermitage Capital, the toxic assets, and the cities unfriendly to the core nationality of Russia and who do not support an official government. What does it prove? There is no official Russian power behind the scene of the Hermitage Capital and the death of Magnitsky, as well as behind the loud raider seizures acquired by the BOOST in form of voting rights and the associated claims. All criminal activities, including corruption, mass murders, terrorism, tax evasion, and serious fraud, took place in the cities where the population is not loyal to the official government of Russia and the Russians by nationality. The death of Magnitsky is not the guilt of either the official Russian government or Russians. There are no reasons not to sell Chanel's bag in the store to Russians. But the Russians have 133 000 000 reasons never to buy anything from Chanel, which served the Third Reich. Neither we nor the government we elected committed this series of aggravated crimes. However, these extremist activities and hatred inciting were intensively distributed through such mass media as BBC, Meduza, Novaya Gazeta, Dozhd, Radio Svoboda, and others of the same kind. At the same time, the true criminal activity that occurred in the Hermitage Capital case and related toxic assets eluded their close attention. That confirms another piece of evidence, that these mass media were not independent journalism, but were used for brainwashing to distribute hate and discriminate against the image of Russia's official government - to call the revolution in the country, that we remember by 1917 and 1991's lessons. These "journalists" acted as a part of the same organized criminal group to commit the same crimes - provoking aggressive war, massacres, terrorism, and crimes which every time, like magic, took place in the cities with the government and population not loyal the official governmental power, predominantly are not Russians by nationality, and in the cities with the highest crime rates, first of all in terms of the number of murders.

Again - that's the 100% of pairs matching, and the end of the explanation about the role of Navalny, Sobol, the true face of the FBK, and other "democratic" sources of "valuable knowledge" about the "truth" about Russia, and the reasons for mass public outcries.

RMC did not possess enough money to deploy the industrial large mining farm, however, it was executed on the territory of ZIL, operated by AFK Sistema and its affiliates - Grigory Luchansky, Umar Dzhabrailov, Andrey Molchanov. The miners, as explained below, were illegally disposed of from the Smart Heat business. On the territory of ZIL, RMC's farm has been working, and the process of heavy upload precisely matched the Presidential election and activity of Navalny. The participant of RMC, Qiwi, has a JV with PJSC MTS and is included in the Group of AFK Sistema. The project itself was intensively covered by Boris Titov and partya Rosta. After the elections were done, the farms were switched off. At the moment there is only 2017-2018 information about the RMC, no actual data. The mining activity also precisely matched the increase in the bitcoin rate. However, the market economic basics say that with the increase of supply, the price shall rise. In the case of RMC, the Russian market consumed all surplus of the mined cryptocurrency.

So matching all these events were supposed that RMC's mining did not have the initial business purposes, but was used as a source of money to sponsor Titov, and impair the results of presidential elections in 2018, among other using the Navalny and FBK activity.

Boris Titov, among his involvement in RMC activity, made an input into the Sunrise case, when disregards of prohibition to use detention for entrepreneurs, Bobylev got nine years of sentencing, previously spending more than one year in pre-trial detention. The input of Titov to the Sunrise case was the nine years of sentencing to Bobylev. Combining that with the patronage of Titov and partiya Rosta over the illegal crypto mining, and using of these black crypto funds with a non-confirmed origin for the elections, together with the previously funded terroristic attacks in politically unstable cities - the terroristic act in the Zimnyaya Vishnya shopping center committed after the elections which results did not satisfy the "older comrades" - deliver us the pair cases for Perm, Kazan, FBK activity, and several other loud criminal proceedings. Later Titov continued his activity to return important witnesses to Russia with his "List of Titov" when instead of justification, those who came back faced imprisonment.

At the moment, BOOST, together with Raevskaya-Repnina as a private individual, has a set of reliable claims against Bobylev as a result of the facts of fraud in the Smart Heat business, and against the entire RMC team, including Multiklet, Bobylev Sergey and Bobyleva Oksana, Dmitry Marinichev, Radius Group, Shang Shung Institute, Sect Dzog Chen Rinchenling, Qiwi Company, Nikolaev, Party of Growth in connection with the theft of equipment, intellectual property and copyright infringement from Smart Heat.

BOOST and Raevskaya-Repnina together possess another portion of the claims against the trinity of Oleg Yakovlev, Oleg Martynov, and Oksana Bobyleva. These claims came up as a result of the "trinity"'s participation in organizing an attempt on the illegal criminal prosecution of Raevskaya-Repnina aiming to murder her and the raider seizure of the BOOST, which can be motivated by many reasons. Based on these claims together, BOOST and Raevskaya-Repnina, as the private individual, shall claim, among other things, the property of the defendants. That includes 100% of the Smart Heat business, 100% of the RMC business, and the property and assets of their successors. BOOST also claims rights to Oleg Martynov's assets, including his 25% stake in Russian Capital Bank, his stakes in companies such as Solo-I, Kosta Klassik, and Priladozhye, as well as related claims against Tinkoff Bank, Alfa-Bank, VTB Bank, Rebgunam, Bashmakov, Frolov and other related parties. The stake in SOLO-I was captured by the Folembray, deceptively, in the same way, observed by us in the Bananamama case, when its' equity was transferred to the Derwood Holding Corp through the falsification of the EGRUL data. Trident Trust BVI, the largest service provider, manages both companies, Folembrey and Derwood. Folembrey is a member of the Tinkoff Bank and Alfa-Bank Groups of Entities.